Opinions and Current Issues Blog

Saba Ahmad is a Litigator working on environmental, administrative and commercial matters in Toronto. Learn more at www.sabaahmad.com

Video Taping an Examination #CDNlegal #litigation

camera picInteresting decision in the ORs today.  In J.M. v. Clouthier et al., 2013 ONSC 221, Hennessy J. allowed a motion to videotape a defendant‘s examination for discovery for potential use at trial.  The court held there was a risk the defendant might become unavailable, due to health issues, or that he could absent himself intentionally.

The defendant is a convicted sex offender and former priest and the plaintiff was his victim.

In the circumstances, the “win” for the plaintiff is satisfying.  Unfortunately, the court’s analysis of potential prejudice to the defendant is a bit light.

The court held prejudice would be minimal based on the degree of intrusion to the defendant and consideration of technical and cost issues.  However the court did not discuss the strategic advantage to the plaintiff of having the potential option of introducing videotaped evidence at trial.

Properly edited, video footage can be very powerful.  With hours of footage available, a litigant could choose unflattering clips that are not necessarily otherwise relevant.  Of course a judge would prevent any abusive conduct, but there is not a level playing field when one party controls how the other party is depicted.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on April 3, 2013 by in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , .

Twitter Updates

%d bloggers like this: